next thing, i saw this article in the straits times "Music on your blog? You may need to license it". well, i think it's a bit ridiculous. they say that cos we're using the music on the blog, it's similar to distributing it or something like that and we should pay royalties to continue using it. people like me, who have non-downloadable music with no advertising on it, would have to pay at least $1000 per year for the license to keep playing music. and they call it a reasonable fee. i think it's a bit ridiculous. i mean, there isn't much difference between me using this music on my blog and say, people playing their cds at a party is there? i'm using the music to liven up my blog a little, for the enjoyment of me and my readers. i'm not profitting from it. and as far as i know, no one else is either, unless someone out there is secretly using their tape recorder or something to record the song.
which brings me to my next complaint. sometimes, well all the time, the govt is nagging and nagging about illegal music so much, but they're not exactly making it easier for people. i mean, people like me want to pay for their music but can't. why? not because it's too expensive or anything, but because i don't own a credit card. and because i don't own a credit card, even if they reduce the prices to dirt cheap prices, i still can't pay for it. i want to pay for it, believe me. you think i like having to be an illegal bootlegger?

anyway, i better stop before they come and arrest me for whatever reason. sigh.
No comments:
Post a Comment